Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum

On April 5 eligible electors from the City of Parksville, Town of Qualicum Beach and Regional District of Nanaimo (RDN) Electoral Areas (EA) E, F, G and H will decide if the RDN can borrow up to $30 million to expand Ravensong Aquatic Centre.
Want to learn more?
- Register and subscribe to this project for email updates.
- Missed attending one of our information sessions? You can see the information boards that were shared at the events or watch the virtual session video.
- Check out the Background Documents that has information on the proposed expansion, referendum and more.
- Visit the project FAQ's - we will be updating the FAQ’s as we move forward to help answer your questions.
- Learn more about the history of the Ravensong Aquatic Centre expansion project and how we got to referendum here.
- Ask us a question using the Q & A tab below.
Visit rdn.bc.ca/ravensong-referendum(External link) for more information on voting in the referendum including the three ways to vote, who can vote and voting locations.
On April 5 eligible electors from the City of Parksville, Town of Qualicum Beach and Regional District of Nanaimo (RDN) Electoral Areas (EA) E, F, G and H will decide if the RDN can borrow up to $30 million to expand Ravensong Aquatic Centre.
Want to learn more?
- Register and subscribe to this project for email updates.
- Missed attending one of our information sessions? You can see the information boards that were shared at the events or watch the virtual session video.
- Check out the Background Documents that has information on the proposed expansion, referendum and more.
- Visit the project FAQ's - we will be updating the FAQ’s as we move forward to help answer your questions.
- Learn more about the history of the Ravensong Aquatic Centre expansion project and how we got to referendum here.
- Ask us a question using the Q & A tab below.
Visit rdn.bc.ca/ravensong-referendum(External link) for more information on voting in the referendum including the three ways to vote, who can vote and voting locations.
Q&A
Do you have a question about the Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion project referendum that hasn't been answered in our FAQ's?
If so, please ask us here.
-
Share What do I need to bring to confirm my eligibility to vote on General Voting Day? on Facebook Share What do I need to bring to confirm my eligibility to vote on General Voting Day? on Twitter Share What do I need to bring to confirm my eligibility to vote on General Voting Day? on Linkedin Email What do I need to bring to confirm my eligibility to vote on General Voting Day? link
What do I need to bring to confirm my eligibility to vote on General Voting Day?
Barbara Peyton asked 5 days agoIf you're not on the voters list, you can register at the time of voting by completing an application form. You will be asked to provide two pieces of identification that prove who you are and where you live. One of them must have your signature on it. For a list of accepted identification please see our Resident Electors FAQ sheet(External link) or visit rdn.bc.ca/Ravensong-Referendum(External link). There are additional requirements to register as a Non-Resident Property Elector, please see our Non-Resident Property Elector FAQ sheet(External link).
If you are already on the voters list, identification is not required.
To find out if you are on the voters list, please call 250-390-4111.
-
Share Some years ago I surveyed the water temperature in the pools from Duncan to Courtenay and discovered that the temperature of Ravensong was kept a number of degrees lower than all other pools surveyed. I DON'T however know if this is still the case. At the time I was told by Ravensong staff it was because the long distance swimmers who used the pool preferred a colder temperature. From speaking with numerous people who wish to use the pool particularly post injury, illness or surgery for rehab and/or for aqua fit classes this colder water is not well received. It can make it difficult for some individuals (and particularly seniors) to partake in programs and use the pool as it's simply too cold. Has a few degrees warmer water temperature ever been part of the discussions in this new expansion, or discussed at any other time, so that more of or our citizens can get to enjoy these facilities for which they pay taxes? Perhaps Ravensong's pool temperature could be on par with facilities both north and south of us? A few degrees temperature in a pool makes a lot of difference. Thank you. on Facebook Share Some years ago I surveyed the water temperature in the pools from Duncan to Courtenay and discovered that the temperature of Ravensong was kept a number of degrees lower than all other pools surveyed. I DON'T however know if this is still the case. At the time I was told by Ravensong staff it was because the long distance swimmers who used the pool preferred a colder temperature. From speaking with numerous people who wish to use the pool particularly post injury, illness or surgery for rehab and/or for aqua fit classes this colder water is not well received. It can make it difficult for some individuals (and particularly seniors) to partake in programs and use the pool as it's simply too cold. Has a few degrees warmer water temperature ever been part of the discussions in this new expansion, or discussed at any other time, so that more of or our citizens can get to enjoy these facilities for which they pay taxes? Perhaps Ravensong's pool temperature could be on par with facilities both north and south of us? A few degrees temperature in a pool makes a lot of difference. Thank you. on Twitter Share Some years ago I surveyed the water temperature in the pools from Duncan to Courtenay and discovered that the temperature of Ravensong was kept a number of degrees lower than all other pools surveyed. I DON'T however know if this is still the case. At the time I was told by Ravensong staff it was because the long distance swimmers who used the pool preferred a colder temperature. From speaking with numerous people who wish to use the pool particularly post injury, illness or surgery for rehab and/or for aqua fit classes this colder water is not well received. It can make it difficult for some individuals (and particularly seniors) to partake in programs and use the pool as it's simply too cold. Has a few degrees warmer water temperature ever been part of the discussions in this new expansion, or discussed at any other time, so that more of or our citizens can get to enjoy these facilities for which they pay taxes? Perhaps Ravensong's pool temperature could be on par with facilities both north and south of us? A few degrees temperature in a pool makes a lot of difference. Thank you. on Linkedin Email Some years ago I surveyed the water temperature in the pools from Duncan to Courtenay and discovered that the temperature of Ravensong was kept a number of degrees lower than all other pools surveyed. I DON'T however know if this is still the case. At the time I was told by Ravensong staff it was because the long distance swimmers who used the pool preferred a colder temperature. From speaking with numerous people who wish to use the pool particularly post injury, illness or surgery for rehab and/or for aqua fit classes this colder water is not well received. It can make it difficult for some individuals (and particularly seniors) to partake in programs and use the pool as it's simply too cold. Has a few degrees warmer water temperature ever been part of the discussions in this new expansion, or discussed at any other time, so that more of or our citizens can get to enjoy these facilities for which they pay taxes? Perhaps Ravensong's pool temperature could be on par with facilities both north and south of us? A few degrees temperature in a pool makes a lot of difference. Thank you. link
Some years ago I surveyed the water temperature in the pools from Duncan to Courtenay and discovered that the temperature of Ravensong was kept a number of degrees lower than all other pools surveyed. I DON'T however know if this is still the case. At the time I was told by Ravensong staff it was because the long distance swimmers who used the pool preferred a colder temperature. From speaking with numerous people who wish to use the pool particularly post injury, illness or surgery for rehab and/or for aqua fit classes this colder water is not well received. It can make it difficult for some individuals (and particularly seniors) to partake in programs and use the pool as it's simply too cold. Has a few degrees warmer water temperature ever been part of the discussions in this new expansion, or discussed at any other time, so that more of or our citizens can get to enjoy these facilities for which they pay taxes? Perhaps Ravensong's pool temperature could be on par with facilities both north and south of us? A few degrees temperature in a pool makes a lot of difference. Thank you.
Genelle asked 8 days agoThe B.C. Guidelines for Pool Operations are regulations set by the BC Health Department and dictate the standards for pool water temperatures in public swimming pools. The regulation requires that the temperature of the pool water must not exceed 37 degrees Celsius, except for a hot tub, which must not exceed 40 degrees Celsius. The regulation also states that the maximum allowable temperature for pools protects the public from heat stroke or other potential heat/exertion risks, especially in activities of higher exertion such as length swimming and aquafit. Ravensong Aquatic Centre is a community pool and not a competitive pool by nature and is also not used solely for competitive swimming.
The pool is utilized by several different user categories such as public swimming, length swimming, physiotherapy, swimming lessons and aquafit. To balance comfort with the provision of safety, the Ravensong Aquatic Centre current main pool temperature is maintained at 29 degrees Celsius. If the referendum passes and the facility expansion proceeds, there will be further discussion and designs regarding the pool temperatures which will be based on programming needs, mechanical efficiencies, patron comfort and safety. There would be the ability to have different pool temperatures set for the newer pool addition than the current pool tank. However, there will be consideration of the programming planned for the pool to ensure that we maintain a safe environment for all users.
If you are looking specifically for a warmer body of water while at the Ravensong Aquatic Centre, please consider using the leisure pool at the facility which is maintained at 34.5 degrees Celsius.
-
Share Sorry for lengthy note. 1) The QB avg tax increase quoted in open meetings was $122 per home, or some 2.5 % of. The QB Town Council presentation gave that value rising to $310 by 2029. Even allowing for significant tax increases for other town priorities by that time, the Ravensong expansion will rise to 5% of our tax bill. Why was this not in the information sessions ? 2) The second issue is of interest to we “climate change” geeks! Current facility emissions are about 350 tonnes CO2E per year, some 2% of our QB RCI. I consult in this area and think claims of a 94% reduction may not stack up to scrutiny. The new facility power draw of some 1.8 million kWh per year translates to about 80 tonnes per year of CO2E emission not the 10 claimed. For those who might point to the use of solar panels (a sensible use of new technology) not much help there. The average life-cycle emission profile of solar panels globally is higher than the BC grid power. And if your panels are made in China, largely by coal-power…connect the dots.. 3) On the same GHG impact, the total cost of the energy upgrades will be some $5.5 million financed over 20 years. Without going over all the details it works out to ~$1,500 per tonne of CO2E abated. Quebec and California base their carbon reduction plans on emission trading and Elon Musk (OK, I don’t like him either!) sits on mountains of saleable credits at about $120-150 per tonne or 1/10th of that part of the proposed expansion costs. This is also about the same cost of sequestration. Maybe I'm missing something? Your comments appreciated. on Facebook Share Sorry for lengthy note. 1) The QB avg tax increase quoted in open meetings was $122 per home, or some 2.5 % of. The QB Town Council presentation gave that value rising to $310 by 2029. Even allowing for significant tax increases for other town priorities by that time, the Ravensong expansion will rise to 5% of our tax bill. Why was this not in the information sessions ? 2) The second issue is of interest to we “climate change” geeks! Current facility emissions are about 350 tonnes CO2E per year, some 2% of our QB RCI. I consult in this area and think claims of a 94% reduction may not stack up to scrutiny. The new facility power draw of some 1.8 million kWh per year translates to about 80 tonnes per year of CO2E emission not the 10 claimed. For those who might point to the use of solar panels (a sensible use of new technology) not much help there. The average life-cycle emission profile of solar panels globally is higher than the BC grid power. And if your panels are made in China, largely by coal-power…connect the dots.. 3) On the same GHG impact, the total cost of the energy upgrades will be some $5.5 million financed over 20 years. Without going over all the details it works out to ~$1,500 per tonne of CO2E abated. Quebec and California base their carbon reduction plans on emission trading and Elon Musk (OK, I don’t like him either!) sits on mountains of saleable credits at about $120-150 per tonne or 1/10th of that part of the proposed expansion costs. This is also about the same cost of sequestration. Maybe I'm missing something? Your comments appreciated. on Twitter Share Sorry for lengthy note. 1) The QB avg tax increase quoted in open meetings was $122 per home, or some 2.5 % of. The QB Town Council presentation gave that value rising to $310 by 2029. Even allowing for significant tax increases for other town priorities by that time, the Ravensong expansion will rise to 5% of our tax bill. Why was this not in the information sessions ? 2) The second issue is of interest to we “climate change” geeks! Current facility emissions are about 350 tonnes CO2E per year, some 2% of our QB RCI. I consult in this area and think claims of a 94% reduction may not stack up to scrutiny. The new facility power draw of some 1.8 million kWh per year translates to about 80 tonnes per year of CO2E emission not the 10 claimed. For those who might point to the use of solar panels (a sensible use of new technology) not much help there. The average life-cycle emission profile of solar panels globally is higher than the BC grid power. And if your panels are made in China, largely by coal-power…connect the dots.. 3) On the same GHG impact, the total cost of the energy upgrades will be some $5.5 million financed over 20 years. Without going over all the details it works out to ~$1,500 per tonne of CO2E abated. Quebec and California base their carbon reduction plans on emission trading and Elon Musk (OK, I don’t like him either!) sits on mountains of saleable credits at about $120-150 per tonne or 1/10th of that part of the proposed expansion costs. This is also about the same cost of sequestration. Maybe I'm missing something? Your comments appreciated. on Linkedin Email Sorry for lengthy note. 1) The QB avg tax increase quoted in open meetings was $122 per home, or some 2.5 % of. The QB Town Council presentation gave that value rising to $310 by 2029. Even allowing for significant tax increases for other town priorities by that time, the Ravensong expansion will rise to 5% of our tax bill. Why was this not in the information sessions ? 2) The second issue is of interest to we “climate change” geeks! Current facility emissions are about 350 tonnes CO2E per year, some 2% of our QB RCI. I consult in this area and think claims of a 94% reduction may not stack up to scrutiny. The new facility power draw of some 1.8 million kWh per year translates to about 80 tonnes per year of CO2E emission not the 10 claimed. For those who might point to the use of solar panels (a sensible use of new technology) not much help there. The average life-cycle emission profile of solar panels globally is higher than the BC grid power. And if your panels are made in China, largely by coal-power…connect the dots.. 3) On the same GHG impact, the total cost of the energy upgrades will be some $5.5 million financed over 20 years. Without going over all the details it works out to ~$1,500 per tonne of CO2E abated. Quebec and California base their carbon reduction plans on emission trading and Elon Musk (OK, I don’t like him either!) sits on mountains of saleable credits at about $120-150 per tonne or 1/10th of that part of the proposed expansion costs. This is also about the same cost of sequestration. Maybe I'm missing something? Your comments appreciated. link
Sorry for lengthy note. 1) The QB avg tax increase quoted in open meetings was $122 per home, or some 2.5 % of. The QB Town Council presentation gave that value rising to $310 by 2029. Even allowing for significant tax increases for other town priorities by that time, the Ravensong expansion will rise to 5% of our tax bill. Why was this not in the information sessions ? 2) The second issue is of interest to we “climate change” geeks! Current facility emissions are about 350 tonnes CO2E per year, some 2% of our QB RCI. I consult in this area and think claims of a 94% reduction may not stack up to scrutiny. The new facility power draw of some 1.8 million kWh per year translates to about 80 tonnes per year of CO2E emission not the 10 claimed. For those who might point to the use of solar panels (a sensible use of new technology) not much help there. The average life-cycle emission profile of solar panels globally is higher than the BC grid power. And if your panels are made in China, largely by coal-power…connect the dots.. 3) On the same GHG impact, the total cost of the energy upgrades will be some $5.5 million financed over 20 years. Without going over all the details it works out to ~$1,500 per tonne of CO2E abated. Quebec and California base their carbon reduction plans on emission trading and Elon Musk (OK, I don’t like him either!) sits on mountains of saleable credits at about $120-150 per tonne or 1/10th of that part of the proposed expansion costs. This is also about the same cost of sequestration. Maybe I'm missing something? Your comments appreciated.
Len Flint asked 19 days ago1) The QB avg tax increase quoted in open meetings was $122 per home, or some 2.5 % of. The QB Town Council presentation gave that value rising to $310 by 2029. Even allowing for significant tax increases for other town priorities by that time, the Ravensong expansion will rise to 5% of our tax bill. Why was this not in the information sessions ?
Correct, the annual impact per average household in the Town of Qualicum Beach, based on the 2025 BC Housing Assessment, is estimated at $122.36. Further, the following table was developed for the information sessions to represent the projected tax requisition for each participating service area which also includes the annual operating costs for the proposed facility expansion:
Participating
Area
Average 2024 Tax
Requisition
2025 Avg
Residential
Value
Projected Tax Requisition for
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Service2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Parksville
64.83
760,678
79.11
130.84
149.09
171.15
174.20
Qualicum Beach
113.48
964,544
139.86
231.49
263.32
301.90
307.69
EA E
26.48
1,274,458
33.14
54.80
62.45
72.64
73.92
EA F
85.82
749,286
100.40
166.34
189.57
217.29
221.04
EA G
101.69
1,009,500
125.18
205.94
234.20
268.53
273.57
EA H
55.98
915,265
69.56
115.32
130.88
150.10
152.85
2) The second issue is of interest to we “climate change” geeks! Current facility emissions are about 350 tonnes CO2E per year, some 2% of our QB RCI. I consult in this area and think claims of a 94% reduction may not stack up to scrutiny. The new facility power draw of some 1.8 million kWh per year translates to about 80 tonnes per year of CO2E emission not the 10 claimed. For those who might point to the use of solar panels (a sensible use of new technology) not much help there. The average life-cycle emission profile of solar panels globally is higher than the BC grid power. And if your panels are made in China, largely by coal-power…connect the dots..
The project uses annual, industry-standard, integrated BC electricity grid emission factors to calculate the emissions from the Ravensong Expansion’s expected electricity use. We use the integrated grid emission factor because the facility will be connected to the integrated grid. These emission factors are available here: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/climate-change/industry/reporting/quantify/electricity(External link). The emission factor values range from 9.7 to 11.5 grams of carbon per kWh of electricity (or 9.7 to 11.5 tonnes of carbon per GWh electricity). The facility will use 1.8 million kWh per year (or 1.8 GWh). Multiplying the emission factor times the electricity use indicates the facility emissions will be between 17.46 tCO2e/yr and 20.7 tCO2e/yr. Even using the lifecycle grid emission factor of 14g carbon/kWh gives a maximum of 25 tCO2e/yr. A 94% reduction from 350 tCO2e/yr is ~20 tCO2e/yr, consistent with the amounts indicated in the presentation to Oceanside Services Committee and shared with the Regional District of Nanaimo (RDN) Board (presentation is available here: https://www.getinvolved.rdn.ca/45563/widgets/191384/documents/141322. The project has never claimed to reduce emissions to 10 tCO2e/year.
3) On the same GHG impact, the total cost of the energy upgrades will be some $5.5 million financed over 20 years. Without going over all the details it works out to ~$1,500 per tonne of CO2E abated. Quebec and California base their carbon reduction plans on emission trading and Elon Musk (OK, I don’t like him either!) sits on mountains of saleable credits at about $120-150 per tonne or 1/10th of that part of the proposed expansion costs. This is also about the same cost of sequestration. Maybe I'm missing something? Your comments appreciated.
Yes, the cost per tCO2e abatement is high for the last emission reductions on the project, it is consistent with ‘going the last mile’ and in this case includes not only reductions for embodied emissions that would not be captured in the abatement cost calculation, but also the measures required to comply with the Canadian Green Building Council (CaGBC) Zero Carbon building standard, maintaining eligibility for the Federal Green and Inclusive Community Buildings funding stream of which the RDN recently received a $7 million funding contribution from the federal government for the proposed expansion project. Emission reduction measures on the project also bring value that goes beyond basic abatement cost calculations, including local electricity generation potential, improved energy efficiency, technology demonstration and use of low impact building materials.
-
Share How long will the new facility be functional before needing another upgrade, so what is the “lifespan” on the new upgrade? on Facebook Share How long will the new facility be functional before needing another upgrade, so what is the “lifespan” on the new upgrade? on Twitter Share How long will the new facility be functional before needing another upgrade, so what is the “lifespan” on the new upgrade? on Linkedin Email How long will the new facility be functional before needing another upgrade, so what is the “lifespan” on the new upgrade? link
How long will the new facility be functional before needing another upgrade, so what is the “lifespan” on the new upgrade?
Erin Munroe asked 12 days agoWhile some systems and finishes will require updates or replacement over the next 20 years, the anticipated lifespan of the proposed new facility upgrade is 40 years or more before any major renovations or significant replacements would be needed.
-
Share I understand the Town of Qualicum Beach already pays for the pool, will they have an additional cost if the upgrade is approved? on Facebook Share I understand the Town of Qualicum Beach already pays for the pool, will they have an additional cost if the upgrade is approved? on Twitter Share I understand the Town of Qualicum Beach already pays for the pool, will they have an additional cost if the upgrade is approved? on Linkedin Email I understand the Town of Qualicum Beach already pays for the pool, will they have an additional cost if the upgrade is approved? link
I understand the Town of Qualicum Beach already pays for the pool, will they have an additional cost if the upgrade is approved?
Ashbrown asked 13 days agoCorrect, the Town of Qualicum Beach does pay for the pool along with the other service participants RDN Electoral Areas E, F, G, H, and the City of Parksville. The costs of the services are based on the percentage of usage of the service as determined by a survey of usage carried out by the RDN every five years.
If the referendum to borrow up to $30 million for the expansion of Ravensong Aquatic Centre is approved, there would be additional costs.
The table located in our Frequently Asked Questions outlines the proposed tax requisitions from the 2025-2029 Financial Plan broken down by participating service area. These amounts include estimates for an expanded facility including pool admissions and rentals, staffing, programming, maintenance, and operations. However, these estimates will be further refined in subsequent budgets should the expansion project proceed. For example, the potential reductions from the Net Zero energy design are not incorporated in the Financial Plan as well as the recently announced funding contribution from the Government of Canada.
The table includes the operations of the building as it is, considerations for operation of an expanded building and the estimated borrowing costs based on $30 million long term borrowing. Should the project not proceed, revenues and expenditures related to an expanded facility will be removed from the 2026-2030 Financial Plan for the RDN Board’s review and consideration to reflect operating the facility in its current form.
-
Share Please allow space for a swim suit dryer in the change room. As you probably know, Aquam is Canadian company. I think we could fundraise for it over the next two years. on Facebook Share Please allow space for a swim suit dryer in the change room. As you probably know, Aquam is Canadian company. I think we could fundraise for it over the next two years. on Twitter Share Please allow space for a swim suit dryer in the change room. As you probably know, Aquam is Canadian company. I think we could fundraise for it over the next two years. on Linkedin Email Please allow space for a swim suit dryer in the change room. As you probably know, Aquam is Canadian company. I think we could fundraise for it over the next two years. link
Please allow space for a swim suit dryer in the change room. As you probably know, Aquam is Canadian company. I think we could fundraise for it over the next two years.
RHawes asked 21 days agoThank you for your suggestion. If the referendum passes and the expansion proceeds, there will be detail design process where this can be considered.
-
Share do voters need to bring any identification to vote on the Ravensong expansion referendum? on Facebook Share do voters need to bring any identification to vote on the Ravensong expansion referendum? on Twitter Share do voters need to bring any identification to vote on the Ravensong expansion referendum? on Linkedin Email do voters need to bring any identification to vote on the Ravensong expansion referendum? link
do voters need to bring any identification to vote on the Ravensong expansion referendum?
R.D. asked 23 days agoIf you're not on the voters list, you can register at the time of voting by completing an application form. You will be asked to provide two pieces of identification that prove who you are and where you live. One of them must have your signature on it. For a list of accepted identification please see our Resident Electors FAQ sheet(External link) or visit rdn.bc.ca/Ravensong-Referendum(External link). There are additional requirements to register as a Non-Resident Property Elector, please see our Non-Resident Property Elector FAQ sheet(External link).
If you are already on the voters list, identification is not required.
To find out if you are on the voters list, please call 250-390-4111.
-
Share Thank you for your previous response, although it did not answer my question. Change rooms are an integral part of a pool facility. I see renderings for the pool portion. Given the significant departure from the normal change room design, it may be wise to provide details of the proposed change rooms, especially since this may influence one's vote in the referendum. If the proposal is part of an industry "best practice", there must be detailed information that you can provide regarding the mode of operation and design details…just like the details of the pool facility. The public will be interacting with the change room design before and after every pool or therapy session. Please note that the proposed facility has more than a 4x multiplier on "universal" space compared to the existing facility. There must be data ,relevant to our geographic area, that identifies gender by gender by non-specific gender the percentage space needs and thus justifies the significant change in space allocation and resulting increase in cost, other than a general "design philosophy" or "best practice ". Best regards, P M on Facebook Share Thank you for your previous response, although it did not answer my question. Change rooms are an integral part of a pool facility. I see renderings for the pool portion. Given the significant departure from the normal change room design, it may be wise to provide details of the proposed change rooms, especially since this may influence one's vote in the referendum. If the proposal is part of an industry "best practice", there must be detailed information that you can provide regarding the mode of operation and design details…just like the details of the pool facility. The public will be interacting with the change room design before and after every pool or therapy session. Please note that the proposed facility has more than a 4x multiplier on "universal" space compared to the existing facility. There must be data ,relevant to our geographic area, that identifies gender by gender by non-specific gender the percentage space needs and thus justifies the significant change in space allocation and resulting increase in cost, other than a general "design philosophy" or "best practice ". Best regards, P M on Twitter Share Thank you for your previous response, although it did not answer my question. Change rooms are an integral part of a pool facility. I see renderings for the pool portion. Given the significant departure from the normal change room design, it may be wise to provide details of the proposed change rooms, especially since this may influence one's vote in the referendum. If the proposal is part of an industry "best practice", there must be detailed information that you can provide regarding the mode of operation and design details…just like the details of the pool facility. The public will be interacting with the change room design before and after every pool or therapy session. Please note that the proposed facility has more than a 4x multiplier on "universal" space compared to the existing facility. There must be data ,relevant to our geographic area, that identifies gender by gender by non-specific gender the percentage space needs and thus justifies the significant change in space allocation and resulting increase in cost, other than a general "design philosophy" or "best practice ". Best regards, P M on Linkedin Email Thank you for your previous response, although it did not answer my question. Change rooms are an integral part of a pool facility. I see renderings for the pool portion. Given the significant departure from the normal change room design, it may be wise to provide details of the proposed change rooms, especially since this may influence one's vote in the referendum. If the proposal is part of an industry "best practice", there must be detailed information that you can provide regarding the mode of operation and design details…just like the details of the pool facility. The public will be interacting with the change room design before and after every pool or therapy session. Please note that the proposed facility has more than a 4x multiplier on "universal" space compared to the existing facility. There must be data ,relevant to our geographic area, that identifies gender by gender by non-specific gender the percentage space needs and thus justifies the significant change in space allocation and resulting increase in cost, other than a general "design philosophy" or "best practice ". Best regards, P M link
Thank you for your previous response, although it did not answer my question. Change rooms are an integral part of a pool facility. I see renderings for the pool portion. Given the significant departure from the normal change room design, it may be wise to provide details of the proposed change rooms, especially since this may influence one's vote in the referendum. If the proposal is part of an industry "best practice", there must be detailed information that you can provide regarding the mode of operation and design details…just like the details of the pool facility. The public will be interacting with the change room design before and after every pool or therapy session. Please note that the proposed facility has more than a 4x multiplier on "universal" space compared to the existing facility. There must be data ,relevant to our geographic area, that identifies gender by gender by non-specific gender the percentage space needs and thus justifies the significant change in space allocation and resulting increase in cost, other than a general "design philosophy" or "best practice ". Best regards, P M
Makula asked about 1 month agoDue to the initial design expansion stage and the costs associated with providing renderings, there are currently no renderings supplied for the changeroom facilities, however there is detailed information on the changeroom measurements included in the September 23, 2024 Presentation(External link). The Universal Changeroom area is 300.64 metres squared, the Men’s Changeroom area is 55.7 metres squared, and the Women’s Changeroom is 62.8 metres squared. The changeroom design follows the BC Building Code but is also in line with the 2021 B.C. Guidelines for Pool Design Section 5.1 BC Guidelines for Pool Design(External link) and the 2020 B.C. Building Accessibility Handbook (see A-1.4.1.2(1) Defined Terms) Building Accessibility Handbook 2020(External link) .
To clarify, the use of the language “Family” is an outdated term and we are endeavoring to update this wherever we can. The updated and more widely used term is “Universal”. The intention of the proposed increased universal space is to allow more accessible and flexible options for all users, it will not be limited to families. The 16 universal changeroom stalls offer a slightly larger private space than the stalls in the gendered changerooms. This added space can be for people who may use mobility aids such as a walker or wheelchair, parents needing more space with their children, or for people who just require a bit more privacy of space. The traditional gendered changerooms will still be available for anyone who feels more comfortable in this space.
-
Share While I understand that the Board has decided to proceed with the Original Option design, I respectfully request that the need for a fitness center be revisited. Given the numerous proven benefits of having a fitness facility available to the community, such as promoting physical health, enhancing mental well-being, and fostering social connections, many in the community believe it is crucial to reconsider its inclusion in the potential expansion. A fitness center would greatly complement the existing and future amenities and serve as a valuable resource for residents of all ages. Will the Board please re-evaluate the decision and explore potential avenues to integrate a fitness center into the current project, rather than deferring it to a future phase? on Facebook Share While I understand that the Board has decided to proceed with the Original Option design, I respectfully request that the need for a fitness center be revisited. Given the numerous proven benefits of having a fitness facility available to the community, such as promoting physical health, enhancing mental well-being, and fostering social connections, many in the community believe it is crucial to reconsider its inclusion in the potential expansion. A fitness center would greatly complement the existing and future amenities and serve as a valuable resource for residents of all ages. Will the Board please re-evaluate the decision and explore potential avenues to integrate a fitness center into the current project, rather than deferring it to a future phase? on Twitter Share While I understand that the Board has decided to proceed with the Original Option design, I respectfully request that the need for a fitness center be revisited. Given the numerous proven benefits of having a fitness facility available to the community, such as promoting physical health, enhancing mental well-being, and fostering social connections, many in the community believe it is crucial to reconsider its inclusion in the potential expansion. A fitness center would greatly complement the existing and future amenities and serve as a valuable resource for residents of all ages. Will the Board please re-evaluate the decision and explore potential avenues to integrate a fitness center into the current project, rather than deferring it to a future phase? on Linkedin Email While I understand that the Board has decided to proceed with the Original Option design, I respectfully request that the need for a fitness center be revisited. Given the numerous proven benefits of having a fitness facility available to the community, such as promoting physical health, enhancing mental well-being, and fostering social connections, many in the community believe it is crucial to reconsider its inclusion in the potential expansion. A fitness center would greatly complement the existing and future amenities and serve as a valuable resource for residents of all ages. Will the Board please re-evaluate the decision and explore potential avenues to integrate a fitness center into the current project, rather than deferring it to a future phase? link
While I understand that the Board has decided to proceed with the Original Option design, I respectfully request that the need for a fitness center be revisited. Given the numerous proven benefits of having a fitness facility available to the community, such as promoting physical health, enhancing mental well-being, and fostering social connections, many in the community believe it is crucial to reconsider its inclusion in the potential expansion. A fitness center would greatly complement the existing and future amenities and serve as a valuable resource for residents of all ages. Will the Board please re-evaluate the decision and explore potential avenues to integrate a fitness center into the current project, rather than deferring it to a future phase?
McKechnies asked about 1 month agoThank you for expressing your concern. Regarding your question about the addition of the fitness centre, as noted the Board opted to proceed with the project in its current form, which does not include a fitness center but included the ability to construct one when adequate funding is in place to do so.
At this point in time, the project budget has been set and the referendum underway is based on this budget. Reconsideration to include the fitness facility is not possible, as additional funding would need to be secured through borrowing for the fitness centre to be added.
-
Share However the Ravensong issue plays out can you promise to haul it indefinatly should we find ourselves in and economic war with the US. on Facebook Share However the Ravensong issue plays out can you promise to haul it indefinatly should we find ourselves in and economic war with the US. on Twitter Share However the Ravensong issue plays out can you promise to haul it indefinatly should we find ourselves in and economic war with the US. on Linkedin Email However the Ravensong issue plays out can you promise to haul it indefinatly should we find ourselves in and economic war with the US. link
However the Ravensong issue plays out can you promise to haul it indefinatly should we find ourselves in and economic war with the US.
Marquis asked about 2 months agoThe RDN is currently monitoring the effects that potential tariffs may have on current and planned capital projects. As part of implementing capital projects, cost estimates are reviewed and updated prior to tender. Should overages occur, the RDN Board receives a report for any large-scale capital project that requires funding beyond the budget in the approved five year Financial Plan. After reviewing the report, the Board then determines the next steps.
Timeline
-
October 8, 2024
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum has finished this stageRDN Board approved Spring 2025 referendum to borrow up to thirty million ($30,000,000) for the Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion project
-
October 22, 2024
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum has finished this stageRDN Board approves the referendum question
-
February 5, 2025
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum has finished this stageReferendum date and information announced.
-
February 24 - March 17, 2025
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum has finished this stageInformation Sessions - six drop-in in-person and one virtual to learn more and ask questions
-
March 26, 2025, 8 a.m. - 8p.m.
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum has finished this stageAdvanced Voting Day
Qualicum Beach Community Hall, 644 Memorial Ave, Qualicum Beach
-
April 2, 2025, 8 a.m. - 8p.m.
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum is currently at this stageAdvanced Voting Day
Qualicum Beach Community Hall, 644 Memorial Ave, Qualicum Beach
-
April 3, 2025
this is an upcoming stage for Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion ReferendumFinal day to request mail ballot.
To request a mail in ballot visit: rdn.bc.ca/Ravensong-Referendum(External link)
-
April 5, 2025, 8 a.m. - 8 p.m.
this is an upcoming stage for Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion ReferendumGeneral Voting Day
To learn more about where to vote visit: rdn.bc.ca/Ravensong-Referendum(External link)
-
April 9, 2025, 4 p.m.
this is an upcoming stage for Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion ReferendumOfficial results announced.
FAQ's
-
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum
- How can I vote in the Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum?
- Who can vote in the referendum?
- What do I need to bring to confirm my eligibility to vote?
- Can I vote online?
- How many votes are needed for a referendum to pass?
- What is the Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum question?
- Does each participating area decide if they pay for the expansion?
- Why is there a referendum for an expansion to Ravensong Aquatic Centre?
- What happens if the referendum passes?
- What happens if the expansion referendum is not approved by electors?
- What is a Referendum (Assent Voting)?
- Will mail ballots be available?
- Will proxies be allowed?
- Who does the RDN borrow the money from?
- Who is the Municipal Finance Authority?
- When does the RDN borrow and draw funds during large scale capital projects?
- When will the referendum results be announced?
- How can I receive updates?
-
GICB Funding Announcement
- Will the funding contribution from the Federal Government change the question on the ballot?
- How will the funding contribution from the Federal Government affect the tax implications?
- If the referendum is not approved by electors, will the funding contribution from the Federal Government still be available?
-
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion
- What would be included in the expansion if the referendum passes?
- How was it decided what amenities to include in the expansion design?
- What is the cost of the project?
- What does the expansion mean for my taxes?
- What happens if the RDN is successful in receiving grant funding?
- What is the total cost to taxpayers of the Ravensong service including the expansion?
- When would construction start?
- How long would the expansion take to build?
- Would there be a pool closure?
- Why does the proposed expansion not include a fitness centre?
- Did you consider a pool in Parksville?
- What type of filtration system would the new pool have and would it have chlorine?
- How much larger would the new facility be?
- How is the RDN dealing with potential tariffs?
- What is the slope of the zero depth beach entry area of the leisure pool addition and what are the depths of both of the new pools?
-
The current Ravensong Aquatic Centre
-
Ravensong Aquatic Centre Expansion Referendum Information Sessions